Keep Pasadena Moving


Our "leaders" want to force you to give up driving. They're proposing to remove lanes on Orange Grove Blvd by installing a “Road Diet”.  As we have see this past summer in Playa del Rey and Mar Vista “road diets” on major boulevards increase accidents and make actually make our roads less safe.  The city and a well funded advocate community is pushing for this change and their using bad data and skewed statistics to support.

And they're doing it without giving us realistic alternatives. As has happened in Playa del Rey and Mar Vista it will great traffic and gridlock and steal time from our lives in a misguided and dangerous plan that will hurt families, communities, and businesses. 

"Road repurposing" as they call it, should be done thoughtfully, not spitefully. We need solutions that help us embrace a multi-modal future without making it impossible to live here now.  

KeepPasadenaMoving is committed to fighting for smart and safe improvements to our streets. When the data doesn't support installing a road diet -- as is too often the case --  neither do we. And neither should our elected officials. 


Pasadena Department of Transportation, Mobility Element

This map from the Mobility Element shows future "road diets" planned in Pasadena. 

You can read the Mobility Element, adopted by the city council in 2015 here.



As seen in the map above this conversation isn't just about a few miles of Orange Grove Blvd, it's about the future of Pasadena and whether or not some of our busiest streets are going to be "dieted" and "repurposed", taking away car lanes and replacing them with bike lanes.

what the road diet advocates are saying2.jpg

Data from the CHP shows that fatalities and injuries to cyclists and pedestrians has been very rare in the past 10 years.  When one looks into the details and the contributing factors to  these accidents it becomes clear a road diet would not have prevented them.


According to standards set forth by the Federal Highway Administration in “The Road Diet Information Guide”  and the city of Pasadena which is quoted in the manual  Orange Grove is not an appropriate candidate for a “road diet”.  The FHWA states that roads with more than 875 cars per hour during the peak commute hours are not suitable candidates for a 3 to 4 lane "road diet". 


The City of Pasadena says roads with more than 15,000 cars per day are not candidates for a "road diet".

From the FHWA Road Diet Information Guide, page 17

Data from 14 years ago found on the Pasadena Department of Transportation website shows measured daily and peak volumes of traffic at Orange Grove and Allen (data taken 5/22/2004):

traffic volume.jpg

The "Pro Road Diet" advocates pushing this plan consistently cite speeding as a major problem on Orange Grove and say that speeding drivers are injuring pedestrians and cyclists, children and the elderly.  Like their other claims, this one doesn't hold up when we examine the CHP data. 

victim age.jpg

As shown in the graphs above speeding was cited as a factor in slightly less than 10% of the accidents that led to injuries of pedestrians and cyclists.  And the overwhelming majority of the pedestrians and cyclists injured on Orange Grove have been between the ages of 20 and 54. 

Safety for all road way users is important, and it's something that everyone wants for their city.  There are real safety improvements that can be made to our streets, that will make pedestirans, cyclists and drivers more safe.  A road diet on Orange Grove isn't one of them.